Eu4 ideal army composition.

Before that at least 1. Having 1 artillery so always give +1 to siege. For siege max bonus its: 5 (fort level 1), 10 (fort level 2-3), 15 (fort level 4-5), 20 (fort level 6-7), 25 (fort level 8-9) By 1600, you should have a strong enough economy to be able to field your entire forcelimit easily. Some screenshots of your economic and military ...Optimal damage-maximizing composition is based on the Combat Width (CW) value. The ideal scenario is having the full CW value worth of artillery (back row) and the CW value worth of infantry, minus X number of cav regiments. X is the (flanking range of cavalry)*2, one set of full flanking range cav on each flank.The simple answer is quality for navy + land military and offensive for pure land military but there's more to it than that. Offensive is better early game because of siege ability and force limit additions whereas quality is better mid to late game because discipline, combat ability and artillery become stronger.Bear in mind, that's Ideal composition mathematically. It doesn't account for cost, supply limit, or the need to reinforce, so take it as a guideline. It doesn't account for cost, supply limit, or the need to reinforce, so take it as a guideline.

The question is, which should be the first 2 Military Ideas that Austria chooses? I ended an Austria game with Quantity (first), Defensive (second), Aristocratic (third), and Quality (fourth). I had absolutely amazing generals with the -1% army tradition decay from Aristocratic idea, the +2% army tradition from Defensive and Quality, and the ...The "ideal" army composition would be something along the lines of 10 infantry/ 6 cavalry / 16 artillery. Anything that goes beyond that is pretty much wasted, but a few extra units in case of losses (or to detach sieges) are okay. Again, any units more rarely ever come to play. Even if there's a huge battle going on it'll rarely ever last long ...

Anyways, enjoy! I made a spreadsheet that calculates the ideal army composition during certain tech levels in EU4. I based this on my own experience, reddit threads about army composition, and threads on other EU4 forums. Link to the spreadsheet. The link is view only but feel free to make a copy under "File" in the top left corner and test it ... Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by bbaron20. Ideal army comp? I am a newer player, playing as Castile, and forming Spain. I find myself in wars with France and other Europeans and im getting clapped despite numerical superiority. My current comp is infantry to 4 less than the line limit plus 4 cavalry in the early game. ... Army composition guide. Reply

But after 1.33 the composition doesn't seem to work as good as before. I barely win any fights and in most of my fights it seems like I'm starting with half the morale of my enemy. I've read the dev diaries and if I understand it correctly, the combat changes make filling up combat width more important than it was before the update.Army composition and Combat Width. I've played eu4 since 2016 but I've never cared to understand this. I get the general idea, combat width means how many regiments can be on the front line, but I'm slightly confused. My combat width is 27, so I can have 27 inf/cav and 27 artillery. But I'm playing as the Netherlands and have a 23 force ...Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh.Mar 15, 2014 · At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed. As far as I understand battles are treated the same whether it is 1 stack v 1 stack or 1v2 stacks. Generally I prefer to use two stacks in these cases. Your stacks should usually be slightly larger than combat width with backup infantry so that you can stay the max frontline combat width for longer. Also, having separate stacks helps with ...

Very early game, for sure, but I think they start to decline much earlier than 1600. Cost efficiency dies even faster. Depending on tech group, your infantry is going to get upgraded at tech levels like 5 and 9, while cavalry often has to wait from 1 to something over 10.

A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... +1 yearly army tradition, +10% morale and +5% discipline. HM to Wallachia with +5% discipline, +1 land leader shock, +20% manpower and +20% manpower recovery.

Armies can be combined for better flanking as needed. In some settings, I'll drop the cavalry altogether. Once artillery exist I'll add up to 4, budget permitting, to help with sieges. So something like 18/2/4. By tech 16, I'll ditch all the cavalry. Army composition is X Infantry and X+4 Artillery, such as 22/0/18.Manchu cavy/arty-only army composition idea. Hello guys, so i currently have a good Manchu campaign going and yesterday stumbled across Siu King's YT video in which he stackwipes anybody as Sunni QQ having 60% cavalry combat ability, 85% cavalry to infantry ratio and 6/6/6/6 Generals while his armies consist only of cavalry and artillery.Qing army composition (non horde) I can't seem to find any good info on what army composition to use for a non horde qing. I formed it from Korea so I only have 50% cavalry to infantry ratio and I've never played an eastern nation with cab bonuses before so I'd like any advice. Assuming you took qing ideas it should be whatever cav you ...Optimal damage-maximizing composition is based on the Combat Width (CW) value. The ideal scenario is having the full CW value worth of artillery (back row) and the CW value worth of infantry, minus X number of cav regiments. X is the (flanking range of cavalry)*2, one set of full flanking range cav on each flank.But the general idea for army composition is this: Pre tech 16, have 1 canon for the siege bonus, and your army primarily infantry with 2 or 4 cav. Post tech 16, you fill out the backrow and start to go pure infantry otherwise. For supply limit issues, just splitting the full width army stack in half and keeping them close.

I do 10inf/4cav/10art for most of the game. I think 4 cav is the max you want for any size stack, so late game just scale it up to like 15/4/15 20/4/20. No idea if this is "ideal" - I think ideal changes every unit upgrade and depending on terrain, tech group, leaders, ideas, etc.Cavalry is not useless 😂. I've found that the best army comp for Europeans is a 2:1 ratio infantry to cavalry. As Sweden you should probably have armies of about 15, with 10 infantry and 5 cavalry. Once artillery is introduced, you should aim for a 2:1:1 ratio, so armies of 20 with 10 inf 5 cav and 5 art. It will also be prudent to replace ...It depends a little on the situation, but I generally avoid fixed army compositions. For the most part, I will aim have about three siege-focused stacks with inf = art, the size of which is enough to siege a fort with a +5 bonus (11 in the early game), combined with a fourth field army that consists of infantry and twice flanking range of cavalry and in total has full …It's still basically free extra damage though, and with eu4's battle mechanics that damage advantage snowballs into a big battle advantage, so don't underestimate it either. Oh, and artillery gives half their defensive pips (rounded down!) to the frontline troop in front of it, that's a nice bonus too. ... r/eu4 • Ideal army composition in 2023?Lets say its the part of the game where you should start shifting over to artillery, Tech 13 I believe. What is your preferred army template? I use 4 Inf, 2 Cav, 4 Artillery. For intents and purposes this is for nations that dont really have unit bonuses, so not Poland/Hungary/Hordes or whoever that Eastern European nation is with the good …Im currently playing as Russia and Im wondering how I should organize my massive military. I know of the spreadsheet except it recommends over 60 regiments per army, and most of my land can barely support 30. Should I keep that ratio and reduce...scientifically speaking, a 1:1 ratio of artillery and infantry (to the combat width) is the ideal composition after military technology 16. but i always disagreed with that. the attrition makes it all useless, and even one battle will make the front line understrength for months. i recommend a a bit more infantry than artillery, and use shift consolidate to keep the front line strong.

4 cav, combat width - 4 infantry, at least 1 cannon after tech 7. So, like 21/4/1. Probably like +2 infantry, for reserve. Consider adding more arty after forming Spain (+1 artillery fire). Just make sure you still have combat width covered with infantry and cavalry. theoretically: 25/25 infantry/artillery is the best way to play.Sort by: Gilad1. •. Build more cavalry. There really isn't an ideal composition for eu4 armies. It's to have enough infantry so that Calvary doesn't get the not enough support malus and enough infantry and Calvary that artillery will not be on the front line. Ideal army composition is enough artillery for combat width post tech 15ish and ...

I do 10inf/4cav/10art for most of the game. I think 4 cav is the max you want for any size stack, so late game just scale it up to like 15/4/15 20/4/20. No idea if this is "ideal" - I think ideal changes every unit upgrade and depending on terrain, tech group, leaders, ideas, etc.I heard 3/1/1 but don't quote me on that. There is no penalty for having a wonky army comp rn so mostly artillery and some lancers for offensive armies. And infantry only for defensive armies, the AI doesn't really build cavalry or artillery so your infantry will be more than enough to defend.Early game (around tech 7 when you get artillery): 10-5-5. Mid game: 10-4-6. Late game: 10-2-10 (or my personal preference with a stack of 22: 12-2-10) So if you were able to afford having two armies of these ratios or have an one army that was doubled it would look like the following.... Early game.Ideal army composition in 2023? ... Some franchises and games of note: Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Mockup Political Map of Anataloia from Tinto Talks #4Army composition is fairly binary. Early game (before tech 13) cav is good, but expensive. Try to have some and try to make sure your front row outnumbers your opponent's so your cav can flank. After tech 13 infantry gets a lot better, and after tech 16 cannons get a lot better.Subreddit for the Europa Universalis IV, Crusader Kings 3 and Victoria 3 mod Anbennar and its fantasy setting ... Hey, I'm playing as Esthil and just switched to the Undead Army. I cant really seem to find much on what an ideal composition would be besides a lot of infantry, and I notice that artillery combat ability has a penalty to it ...That's the beauty of EU4 - you can ignore some penalties if your bonuses are bigger. ... For me at all times my army composition is a full row of infantry and when I get the tech at least 10 cannons, with one exception, when I'm playing as a horde. This decision is based purely on economics. Until about 1650 my army is my main source of income ...

5. sacrich_cc. • 4 yr. ago. As everything with EU it’s pretty complicated, here’s a doc telling you the optimal comp for every tech. 3. BaronWalrus1. • 4 yr. ago. Build a combat width stack with 2 or 4 cavalry depending on your economy give it 3 artillery as well so you can barrage capital forts. The rest of your FL can be saved for ...

Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by KaseyB. What should Horde army composition be in mid-late game? It's 1624 and I can build armies with western units on a vassals provinces (when did this happen? it's amazing!). I'm currently running 8 merc infantry, 7 cav and 5 cannon for individual units of 20. I have a huge income so money isn't really a problem.

Ideal template is always Inf/Cav to fill your front line and have Art on your back row. In early game Art doesn't do too much damage from back row but mid-late game it just decimates enemy armies. But if you can't fill your front row with inf or cav, art eill be on front row and they take extra damage on front row.Aug 26, 2014 · Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh. Your army composition seems mostly good, except in your 32/8/32 example you want 32/8/40. Cavalry can be useful even for nations that don't get buffs. The issue is that for many players of a certain skill level, trying to manage their cavalry along with the rest of the army really isn't worth the micro.Army Composition: Regularly review and adjust your army composition, incorporating advanced units as they become available. Advancing Exploration and Colonization. Explore the Atlantic: Send explorers to chart the Atlantic Ocean, looking for new lands and sea routes, particularly towards the West African coast.There is no general best army composition, because it depends on many factors. Often cavalry is a better than infantry, but it is much more expensive so it is usually not worth the cost. Likewise artillery helps, because it can shoot from the backrow, but it is even more expansive than cavalry, so it is not worth it for its fighting power in ...So your combat width is 36. So your stacks should be something like 46-0-36. I added 10k more infantry since late game battles are really casualty heavy. Now obviously you cannot be running around with an 82k stack, due to supply limit. So you should split them into 23-0-18 stacks of 41k each. These stacks will siege for you, and the moment you ...That holds true. Sunnis are allowed to have a higher percentage of the army without having a combat penalty. Keep in mind that you should focus on the combat width first and than add on artillery as much as you can afford monetarily. They start of being really expensive when you first unlock artillery.Combat width is the limiter here, and I believe the flanking bonus is worth it to have at least 4 horsemen (I run 6 in case one or two get wiped in a battle). The rest is infantry and artillery. 3. I know the the optimal army compositions for normal Western countries, but my question is should it be different for the Prussians? Would an army….Then mutiply the result by your current combat width. Create that many cavalry. Then take combat width and subtract the cavalry number for infantry. Then create artillery equal to combat width. The result is the ideal composition with a buffer. You can then reduce the army size by maintaining the ratio you just created.For a better explanation of composition, and even for combat mechanics in general, check out Reman's Paradox War Acadamy on Youtube. Part 1 is the composition IIRC, and part 2 is Mechanics. Part 3 covers idea groups, but it's not as important.Late Game gets too laggy Thanks in advance : r/eu4. Any mod that limits army and manpower size? Late Game gets too laggy Thanks in advance. 322K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by….Cavalry are elite units who do two special roles (and the biggest question mark wrt army composition). First, they can flank and help mop up smaller enemy armies faster. Second, they typically do a bit more morale and shock damage than infantry (though at 2.5 times the cost) giving you an edge against a difficult opponent.

Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) Tip. TLDR: for the easiest good template: use infantry and cannons equal to your combat width, and add 4 horses. Before tech 16, pick inf and cav with the best offensive shock pips, and arty doesn't matter. After tech 16, pick inf with the best defensive fire ...Heavies only is the ideal naval composition. Naval engagement width has a base of 25. It is not increased by tech, unlike army combat width. It is only increased by a couple of policies you'll never use (because they both require Naval idea group), as well as a context based 10% increase in coastal seas.What army composition is best depends entirely on the situation. Lategame is characterized by very long exhausting battles. While in early game armies are out of morale very quick and retreat without many losses, in late game they may fight until the last man. And regiments deal damage based on their size.Instagram:https://instagram. iron resurrection cast 2023joann fabric vacavillelab week crossword puzzlescause to move crossword clue Army Composition . Question Hello, what is the ideal army compositions throughout EU4? I am playing as Byzantium and am fighting against Spain and completely losing battles despite only being 1 tech behind and having more troops. I am running 20 infantry 4 cav and 16 artillery at mil tech 15. bailey and catoslarge singing groups wsj crossword Best Army Ratios. Okay so normally, it might not be the best, but I set up my armies like this: 50% Infantry|25% Cavalry|25% Artillery. Now don't call me a noob. I just want to know good general army ratios, and maybe others that you can use in specific situations. I know mostly about how military works, but not the super knitty-gritty stuff.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. how do i make kibble in ark I'm a new player and I was just wondering about the ideal army compositions,, especially for Russia if it's nation specific ... This spreadsheet have good army composition and can direct you to more in-depth guide: ... ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio.Army composition meta/recommendations Meta Just finding out (the hard way) about how important army comp is. ... In general it seems like you have the right idea with the comp you are going for. At the start of the game armies will rely more on cav (around 4) because you may not be able to field a full combat width army and in this case ...Been playing EU4 off and on for a number of years now, and for a while I've been running an army composition of having 4 cavalry for every stack I have (assuming I can afford them, ofc). I picked this up several years ago, don't remember from where/who, but I'm now questioning whether this is still effective.